25 Oct 2016

Hilary Clinton's worshipping of Satan...Her “Plan For Syria Would Lead to World War III”, says Trump

        by Jonathan Ekene Ifeanyi
 In September 2015 Hilary Clinton said:

“I am not a Catholic, but I am a great admirer of the Pope, because I think what he’s trying to do is to take the venerable institution, the Roman Catholic Church, and really once again place it on a firm foundation of the scriptures—Christ’s words.”

Again, just a few days ago, the leading opponent of Catholic moral teachings cited Francis to give credibility to her actions. That the Gospel message is essentially spiritual; that Jesus came to save souls, not foment social change or economic equality, enforced by the state, is a position held these days by those “conservative” Catholics derided by the Clinton campaign as “severely backwards” (see:  “Clinton Campaign Official Denounces Catholics as ‘Severely Backwards,’ Calls for Left-Wing Infiltration of Church”) and by anti-pope Francis as, well, every pejorative he can think of: rigorists, neo-Pelagians, legalists, doctors of the law, hypocrites, holier-than-thou, etc. (See:  Big C Catholics: “The Pope Francis Little Book of Insults”).

Indeed, citing of the anti-pope has become an unprecedented, on-going epidemic throughout the world, both within the Church by every moral dissident and outside the Church by numerous enemies of authentic Christian moral teachings, such as Elton John, UN leaders, Barack Obama and hundreds, if not thousands, more. 

But we don’t see men like Donald Trump doing this. And why? Because Trump—his vices notwithstanding—simply doesn't belong to Francis/Obama/Clinton New World Order camp. (See for instance: Boom: Trump BLASTS the Pope With Blunt Statement No One Else Has Got the Guts to Say). And Francis’ regard for Trump? Francis has stated implicitly that Trump is not even a Christian, to start with. “A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not of building bridges, is not Christian”, he said early this year, referring to Trump. (See: Pope Francis says Donald Trump is 'not a Christian').

Of course we do know what Clinton meant by Francis taking “the Roman Catholic Church” and placing it “on a firm foundation of the scriptures—Christ’s words.” Clinton—just like Francis—is a devil worshipper, so both she and Francis are really birds of a feather. Dr. Carol M. Swain, professor of law at Vanderbilt University, has argued that Clinton is proof that Satanism is on the rise in America, in an interview with PJ Media on Saturday, October 22. She also discussed her university's decision to honour Wicca as a religion while denigrating Christianity, and how the so-called “Black Lives Matter” movement is using the suffering of “black people” to promote a Marxist agenda.

“I would argue that Satanism itself is on the rise in the country, and I think that that’s well documented,” Swain declared. She argued that the deceptive tactics associated with Lucifer have infiltrated America’s political discourse, and traced that back to the leftist professor Saul Alinsky.

“It's just a fact that Saul Alinsky dedicated this book Rules for Radicals to Lucifer, and I find it significant that we have, you know, world leaders, our president [Barack Obama] for example, and one of the major presidential candidates [Hillary Clinton] who saw Saul Alinsky as a mentor. And many activists, leftists, they view Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals almost as a Bible.”

So in reality, Clinton’s “Christ’s words” cannot be found in the Bible, but perhaps in Rules for Radicals. Swain said that Clinton—a supporter of abortion and homosexuality—learned her political tricks from Saul Alinsky, and to the extent that Alinsky dedicated his book to the subversive tactics of Lucifer, Clinton's political heritage does arguably come from Satan. Swain also discussed how the occult became established on her campus. “A few years ago, I believe it was 2011 — the same year that ... a rule was imposed on Christian groups that resulted in about half of them leaving the campus as officially recognized groups — we recognized Wicca,” she recalled.

Again, said Swain, “for me, as a faculty member, I have to respect their high holy day, which is Halloween.” October 31 is “treated the same as Christmas, Rosh Hashanah,” and other religious holidays. “So they persecute Christians while other religions are being honoured and treated with the respect that we don't enjoy,” Swain added. “There's a double standard.”

Praising false religions even while persecuting Christians—exactly the same attitude we see in anti-pope Francis.  For instance, in Francis’ 224-page “apostolic exhortation”, called “The Joy of the Gospel’’, released to press in Vatican City on November 26, 2013, the anti-pope, praising Islam even at a time ISIS and Boko Haram were murdering thousands of Christians, maintained that authentic Islam and the proper reading of Qur’an are opposed to every form of violence (See: Pope Francis praises ‘Islamic Values’!)—but ALWAYS, he never wastes time to show the world how nonsensical "authentic Catholicism" really is, and how “rigid” and even “wicked” those who champion it can be! (See: Francis the Destroyer has absorbed the poison of Hell; and  "Catholicism can and must change", apostate Francis insists.

As for Francis being a Satanist, like Clinton and co, see the video: Why does Freemasonry Openly Support Pope Francis? And Grand Lodge of Masons Buy Full Page Newspaper Ad to Welcome Pope Francis).

In short, Obama, Francis, Clinton and co—these are all Satanists.  

Donald Trump, however—his vices notwithstanding—is on the side of Putin, and Putin is on God’s side.

“So, you want to worship Satan? By all means, but leave Russia out of it. Rest assured that I will be your worst nightmare. You can quote me on that.” (Putin to Obama/Hilary, EU/UN leaders and other New World Order advocates).

Again, Putin said, in 2014:

“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.”  (See: (Vladimir Putin: The New World Order Worships Satan!)

Yesterday, Trump took his most aggressive foreign policy shots at Hillary Clinton at an interview from his Trump National Doral golf resort in Florida, saying that her policies on Syria would inevitably lead to World War III. Trump said that Clinton’s plan would engage Russia which “is a nuclear country, but a country where the nukes work as opposed to other countries that talk.”

Republican Donald Trump said that Democrat Hillary Clinton's plan for Syria would “lead to World War Three,” because of the potential for conflict with military forces from nuclear-armed Russia.

On Syria's civil war, Trump said Clinton could drag the United States into a world war with a more aggressive posture toward resolving the conflict.

Clinton has called for the establishment of a no-fly zone and "safe zones" on the ground to protect non-combatants. Some analysts fear that protecting those zones could bring the United States into direct conflict with Russian fighter jets.

“What we should do is focus on ISIS. We should not be focusing on Syria,” said Trump as he dined on fried eggs and sausage at his Trump National Doral golf resort. “You’re going to end up in World War Three over Syria if we listen to Hillary Clinton,” Trump said.

“You’re not fighting Syria any more, you're fighting Syria, Russia and Iran, all right? Russia is a nuclear country, but a country where the nukes work as opposed to other countries that talk," he said.

Trump said Assad is much stronger now than he was three years ago. He said getting Assad to leave power was less important than defeating Islamic State. 

"Assad is secondary, to me, to ISIS," he said.

Trump also questioned how a Clinton administration could find common ground for negotiations with Russia after she, and the Obama administration, had seemingly gone all-in to demonise Putin in an effort to salvage her campaign.

On Russia, Trump again knocked Clinton's handling of U.S.-Russian relations while secretary of state and said her harsh criticism of Putin raised questions about “how she is going to go back and negotiate with this man who she has made to be so evil,” if she wins the presidency.

All these statements are in no way merely political. They are facts, and they are serious.

No comments: