 |
| Galat versus Francis |
Some days ago, one Msgr. John R. Schulte, addressing
the writer of the article “Quo Vadis?”, made the following
comments:
“...The first 25 years of my
priesthood were spent (except for the first two) under a bishop who did
horrible things to the diocese in which I had grown up. At times I thought of
leaving the diocese or even the priesthood. I thought about some of the other
things I had always wanted to do and imagined that I would get a little
apartment somewhere, live quietly, and just try to be a good person. Of course,
that is not what I was ordained to do. God had given me a different vocation.
Now I am officially old and I am tired and all the old nonsense is being touted
by all the same old crowd that held sway in the 1970's, 80's, and 90's in most
dioceses in the USA. I don't really relish the job of being "Athanasius
Contra Mundum" all over again, and maybe I won't be able to. You, however
have a very definite role to play. The scoundrels who lied, manipulated,
bullied, and co-opted Vatican II got away with what they did because there was
no way for most of us to hear or read anything but what they were telling us -
on their own, and through the chanceries, schools, and universities they
controlled. They were the darlings of the secular media. Now things have
changed. They did not get away with their plans to corrupt the last synod of
bishops with impunity as they had Vatican II and it made them as angry as hell!
Why was their campaign for the spreading of false information foiled? It was
because of people like you! I think that somebody out there needs to tell the
truth!!!! The internet is the most powerful tool for doing that. The scoundrels
in high places would love nothing more than for you to give up. Yes, we need
saints! There is always going to be a need for people who go off to the
wilderness and live lives of holiness, sacrifice, penance, and prayer. But
there is also a need for somebody to tell the truth - and that somebody is
you!”
Sure, many people are beginning to
wake up from their apathetic slumber. But unfortunately not the majority!
The majority of priests and lay Catholics the world over still do not care
about telling the truth. In fact many simply do “enjoy” the present mess. Only
an insignificant few — like Prof. Galat and co — do care, and they are
currently being persecuted by the infidels and heretics whose errors they
oppose.
Four days ago, Prof. Galat responded
to one of such lay "Catholics" — one infidel named
Alejandro Bermudez, a defender of Francis — using sound arguments
from the Bible, the “catechism” and the “canon law”. Below is our rough
translation of the article. Although we do not tolerate John Paul II’s FALSE
catechism that promotes terrible errors — for instance we discern error even in
the one single quote below, where it talks about “other Christian faithful” as
if there is anything like that apart from Catholics, an idea which Galat
himself also opposes! — as well as his scandalous “New Code of Canon Law” here,
we relax for now as this intelligent and God-fearing man certainly knows what
he’s doing. (I take it like the case of using what is written in their own
books to counter them).
Hear him:
ALEJANDRO BERMÚDEZ: CHAMPION OF EMOTIONAL PAPOLATRY
by Jose Galat
 |
| Bermúdez |
Mr Alejandro Bermúdez comes against
those who are Catholics and in use of the right to announce and denounce, which
we are granted in the constitution of the church in its 37th paragraph, in the
catechism in paragraph 907, and in the code of Canon Law paragraph 212, 3. We put in mind the
serious errors against the faith which Pope Francis has incurred in his
teaching. The number 907 of the catechism says:
"In accord with the knowledge,
competence and pre-eminence which they possess, [lay people] have the right and
even at times a duty to manifest to the sacred pastors their opinion on matters
which pertain to the good of the Church, and they have a right to make their
opinion known to the other Christian faithful, with due regard to the integrity
of faith and morals and reverence toward their pastors, and with consideration
for the common good and the dignity of persons.”
Mr. Bermúdez is a regular commentator
on EWTN, a television station founded and directed by an extraordinary nun, the
"Mother Angelica," — she, an indescribable defender of the Catholic
faith, who never allowed the means of communication managed by her to serve as
a springboard for characters who propagated heresies. Mother Angelica died a
short time ago, and Alejandro Bermúdez, the director of the journalistic
channel of the television for Hispano-America, has placed the channel at the
service of the worst heretic that the Church has today, who daily and nightly
pronounces follies against the truths of the faith of our noble Catholic
Church. This is Pope Francis, who with his accustomed and false teachings has
produced a formidable disorientation in the Christian family.
Many of those whom Bermudez mistreats with his ignorance — like distinguished Mexican theologian Jose Alberto Villasana and Jose Galat — have demonstrated with reasons, not with simple affirmations, the very serious offences against the faith of Pope Francis. It was also expected that with reasons, hear well with reasons!, with especially biblical arguments and the Magisterium of the same Church, Bermudez demonstrate his opinions in favour of Francis. But no! Bermudez, like any ignorant of the ABC of our Catholic faith, resorts to emotional affirmations, typical of visceral men who cannot think. Bermudez wants us to swallow, without examination, the entire thesis of Pope Bergolio — for example:
* That “no one can be condemned
forever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel” since everyone is saved,
whether or not he complies with the commandments, when, on the contrary, Jesus
declared: “... If you want to enter into eternal life, keep the Commandments”
(Mt. 19; 17) and therefore “Many are called, but few are chosen” (Mt 22:14).
* That “If the education of a boy is
given by Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox or Jews, I do not care. What
interests me is to educate them and take away their hunger”, — against the
affirmation of the Lord who tells us that “... Man does not live by bread
alone, but by every Word that proceeds from the mouth of God” (Mt. 4:4).
* That it is not necessary to
proselytize because making disciples for Christ is nonsense and even a sin and
injustice, while the newly resurrected Christ ordered his disciples to “Go, and
make disciple of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of
the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Mt. 28; 19).
* That unrepentant adulterers can
quietly enter into communion, ignoring the blunt words of St. Paul “... For he
that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself,
not discerning the Body of the Lord.” (1 Cor. 11: 28-29).
* That “God cannot be God without
man,” ignoring that He as the Apocalypse says is the Alpha and the Omega, who
is, and who was, and who is to come; and also as the same Word tells us:
“Before the mountains were made, or the earth and the world was formed; from
eternity and to eternity thou art God.” (Ps. 90:2).
Bermudez responds that we must accept these monstrosities and others that put in grave danger the eternal destiny of all, only because Pope Bergolio says so. But Bermudez is in default to demonstrate with reasons, with reasons!, not with adjectives, nor with sentimentality, nor with emotional verbiage, nor with personal qualifications, that the false teachings of Francis are not false, and that these do not go in opposition to the Bible or to the traditional Magisterium of the Church.
Bermudez responds that we must accept these monstrosities and others that put in grave danger the eternal destiny of all, only because Pope Bergolio says so. But Bermudez is in default to demonstrate with reasons, with reasons!, not with adjectives, nor with sentimentality, nor with emotional verbiage, nor with personal qualifications, that the false teachings of Francis are not false, and that these do not go in opposition to the Bible or to the traditional Magisterium of the Church.
In fact, Bermudez does not consider the elemental
delusions of papal teaching, but only in the condition of the Pope who
pronounces it, and pretends that we swallow the toads Bergoglio gives us, only
because they are being taught by someone who apparently has the status of a
Universal Pontiff. No Mr. Bermudez! You must refute theses with arguments and
arguments with arguments, or at least tell people with the Bible and the
Catechism in your hand, whether we are the wrong ones or the Pope. If the
"Mother Angelica" lived, she who so zealously remained in the authentic
doctrine of Christ, do you think she would allow such disgraced ones against
the faith of the believers?
Mr. Bermudez uses the Latin words, ubi Petrus ibi ecclesia, ubi
ecclesia ibi Christus, which means “where Peter is there the Church is, and
where the Church is, there Christ is”, and this is true, but on the condition
that it is an AUTHENTIC Pope, not a fictitious one, a false one, one who
teaches heresy after heresy and who was shrewdly imposed by a “mafia of
cardinals”, as Cardinal Godfried Danneels, then the cardinals’ most important
leader, confessed with cynicism.
Mr. Bermudez, therefore, intends that
all Catholics should obey without a word, the man who has the appearance of
Pope, but is not in reality. But to obey a false Pope is not
to obey the true Peter, the true Church, or the true Christ — it is to obey the
lie and the devil.
The proof that finally where the
appearance of Peter is is not the reality of
Jesus, is given to us in Chapter 13: 11 of the Apocalypse, which undoubtedly
applies to a heretical Pope, a Pope who teaches falsehoods instead of truths,
and also a Pope who has the appearance of such but who in reality was not
chosen by the Holy Spirit, but by a corrupt, political mafia of cardinals. Thus
Francis is a figure of Peter only in appearance, not in reality, and that is
precisely what our critics — like Mr. Bermudez — should distinguish.
Bermudez points out the reasons given
about the plotters of Francis’ fraudulent election as “irrational”. He knows
that he is not trying to ....Jose Galat or Alberto Villasana, but the same
cardinals who cannot ignore his political manoeuvres, who manipulated the
electoral trend in the 2013 conclave, a practice prohibited and condemned under
penalty of excommunication by the non-repealed Apostolic ConstitutionUniversi
Dominici Gregis of John Paul II.
Also Mr. Bermudez attacks indiscriminately — and with very serious errors — all private revelations. But, although it is true that there is no obligation to believe in them, neither can they be dispatched in a joyful and irresponsible manner in block, because the Word of God already tells us, that the voice of the Holy Spirit should not be stifled and that we must discern the wrong from the true. “Extinguish not the Spirit. Despise not prophecies. But examine all things; hold fast that which is good.” (1 Thessalonians 5, 19-21).
In conclusion, it is necessary that Bermudez before criticizing be informed and criticize with valid reasons, with heavy arguments, that is to say, above all with the same Word of God recorded in the Bible and taught in the Catechism. Otherwise, his critical positions will be unfounded and will not help to strengthen the life of the Church, but rather mislead the poor flock of these times, which is already quite disoriented with the guidance of the false Pope Bergolio.
José Galat.
The original article:
ALEJANDRO BERMÚDEZ: CAMPEÓN DE LA PAPOLATRÍA EMOCIONAL
Lanza en ristre se viene el Señor
Alejandro Bermúdez, contra quienes como católicos y en uso del derecho de
anunciar y denunciar, que nos concede la Constitución sobre la Iglesia en su
numeral 37, recogido en el Catecismo en el numeral 907, y en el Código de
Derecho Canónico, numeral 212, 3, ponemos de presente, los graves errores
contra la fe, en que el Papa Francisco ha incurrido en su magisterio. El
numeral 907 del catecismo, a letra dice:
"Tienen el derecho, y a veces
incluso el deber, en razón de su propio conocimiento, competencia y prestigio,
de manifestar a los pastores sagrados su opinión sobre aquello que pertenece al
bien de la Iglesia y de manifestarla a los demás fieles, salvando siempre la
integridad de la fe y de las costumbres y la reverencia hacia los pastores,
habida cuenta de la utilidad común y de la dignidad de las personas".
El señor Bermúdez es habitual
comentarista de EWTN, canal de televisión fundado y dirigido por una monja
extraordinaria, la “Madre Angélica”, ella, defensora indesmayable de la fe
católica, que no permitió jamás que el medio de comunicación por ella manejado,
sirviera de trampolín a los personajes que propagaban herejías. Murió la Madre
Angélica hace poco tiempo, y Alejandro Bermúdez, apoderado de la dirección
periodística del canal, para hispanoamèrica, ha puesto éste al servicio del
peor hereje que tiene actualmente la Iglesia, que diaria y nochemente pronuncia
insensateces contra las verdades de la fe de nuestra noble Iglesia Catrólica.
Se trata del Papa Francisco, quien con sus acostumbradas y falsas enseñanzas ha
producido una formidable desorientación en la familia cristiana.
Muchos de los que Bermúdez maltrata
con su ignorancia, cómo el distinguido teólogo mexicano José Alberto Villasana
y José Galat, han demostrado con razones, no con simples afirmaciones, las muy
graves faltas contra la fe del Papa Francisco. Se esperaba también con razones,
¡óigase bien con razones!, con argumentos especialmente bíblicos y del
Magisterio de la misma Iglesia, que Bermúdez demostrara sus opiniones en favor
de Francisco. Pero ¡no!, Bermúdez como cualquier ignorante del ABC de nuestra
fe católica, recurre a afirmaciones emocionales, típicas de hombres viscerales
que no saben pensar.
Bermúdez pretende que nos traguemos sin examen, enteras, las falsas tesis del Papa Bergolio, como por ejemplo:
*Que “Nadie puede ser condenado para siempre, porque esa no es la lógica del Evangelio” ya que todo el mundo se salva, cumpla o no los mandamientos, cuando por el contrario Jesús declaró: “…Si quieres entrar en la Vida eterna, cumple los Mandamientos” (Mt. 19; 17) y por tanto “Muchos son llamados y pocos son los escogidos” (Mt. 22; 14).
*Que “Si la educación de un chico se la dan los católicos, los protestantes, los ortodoxos o los judíos, a mí no me interesa. A mí lo que me interesa es que lo eduquen y le quiten el hambre”, esto contra la afirmación del Señor que nos dice “…No solo de pan vive el hombre, sino de toda Palabra que sale de la boca de Dios” (Mt. 4, 4).
*Que no hay que hacer proselitismo porque hacer discípulos para Cristo es una tontería y hasta un pecado e injusticia, esto desconociendo que Cristo recién resucitado ordenó a sus discípulos “Vayan, y hagan que todos los pueblos sean mis discípulos, bautizándolos en el nombre del Padre y del Hijo y del Espíritu Santo” (Mt. 28; 19).
*Que los adúlteros no arrepentidos pueden tranquilamente acceder a la comunión, ignorando las contundentes palabras de San Pablo “…porque si come y bebe sin discernir el Cuerpo del Señor, come y bebe su propia condenación” (1Cor. 11; 28-29).
* “Que Dios no puede ser Dios sin el hombre” pasando por alto que Él como dice el Apocalipsis es el alfa y el omega, el que era, el que es y el que vendrá, y además como nos dice la misma palabra “Antes de ser engendrados los montes, antes de que nacieran la tierra y al mar, desde siempre hasta siempre, eres Dios” (Sal. 90; 5).
Bermúdez responde que hay que aceptar esas monstruosidades y otras más que ponen en grave peligro el destino eterno de todos, únicamente porque lo dijo Bergolio como Papa. Pero en mora está Bermúdez de demostrar con razones, ¡con razones!, no con adjetivos, ni con sentimentalismos, ni con verborrea emocional, ni con calificaciones personales, que no son falsedades las falsas enseñanzas de Francisco, y que éstas no van en oposición a la Biblia ni al Magisterio tradicional de la misma iglesia.
En efecto, no repara Bermúdez en los elementales embustes de la enseñanza papal, sino en la sola condición del Papa que la pronuncia, y pretende que nos traguemos los sapos que nos da Bergoglio, únicamente porque lo dijo quien aparentemente ostenta la calidad de Pontífice Universal. ¡No Señor Bermúdez!, usted debe refutar tesis con tesis y argumentos con argumentos, o por lo menos dígale a la gente con Biblia y Catecismo en mano, si los equivocados somos nosotros o es el Papa. Si la “Madre Angélica” viviera, ella que tan celosamente permaneció en la auténtica doctrina de Cristo, ¿creen ustedes que permitiría semejantes desaguisados contra la fe de los creyentes?
Utiliza el señor Bermúdez el latinajo de ubi petrus ibi ecclesia ubi ecclesia ibi christus, que significa “donde está Pedro está la Iglesia, y donde está la Iglesia está Cristo”, y esto es cierto, pero con la condición de que se trate de un Papa AUTÉNTICO y no de uno ficticio, de uno falso, de uno que enseña herejía tras herejía y que fue impuesto astutamente por una “mafia cardenalicia”, como lo confesó con cinismo el Cardenal Godfried Danneels, a la sazón, líder más importante del cardenalato de nuestra Iglesia.
Pretende pues, el señor Bermúdez que todos los católicos obedezcamos sin más, a quien tiene la apariencia de Papa, pero no lo es en la realidad. Pero obedecer a un falso Papa no es obedecer al verdadero Pedro, ni a la verdadera Iglesia, ni al verdadero Cristo, eso es obedecer a la mentira y al demonio.
La prueba de que finalmente donde
está la apariencia de Pedro no está la realidad de Jesús, nos la da el Capítulo
13; 11-ss del Apocalipsis, que indudablemente se aplica a un Papa herético, a
un Papa que enseña falsedades en vez de verdades, pero también a un Papa que
tiene la apariencia de tal, pero que en realidad no fue elegido por el Espíritu
Santo, sino por una mafia cardenalicia corrupta y politiquera. Así Francisco es
figura de Pedro solo en apariencia, no en la realidad y eso es precisamente lo
que deberían distinguir nuestros críticos, como el señor Bermúdez.
Bermúdez señala de “irracionales” las
razones que dieron los mismos complotados en la elección fraudulenta de
Francisco, sepa él que no está tratando de irracional a José Galat ni a Alberto
Villasana, sino, a los mismos cardenales de quienes no pueden desconocerse sus
maniobras politiqueras, que manipularon la tendencia electoral en el conclave
del 2013, una práctica prohibida y condenada bajo pena de excomunión por la no
derogada -Constitución Apostólica Universi Dominici Gregis- de Juan Pablo II.
También el Sr. Bermúdez, arremete indiscriminadamente y con errores gravísimos contra todas las revelaciones privadas. Pero, si bien es cierto que no hay obligación de creer en ellas, tampoco se pueden despachar de forma alegre e irresponsable en bloque las mismas, porque ya nos dice la Palabra de Dios, que no hay que sofocar la voz del Espíritu Santo y que debemos discernir lo erróneo de lo verdadero. “No extingan la acción del Espíritu; no desprecien las profecías; examínenlo todo y quédense con lo bueno” (1 Tesalonicenses 5; 19-21).
En conclusión, es menester que
Bermúdez antes de criticar se informe y que critique con razones valederas, con
argumentos pesados, es decir ante todo con la misma Palabra de Dios consignada
en la Biblia y enseñada en el Catecismo. De lo contrario, sus posiciones
críticas carecerán de fundamento y contribuirán no a fortalecer la vida de la
Iglesia, sino a desorientar más al pobre rebaño de estos tiempos, que bastante
desorientado anda ya con la guía del falso Papa Bergolio.
José Galat.
Related:
No comments:
Post a Comment