By Paul Anthony Melanson
Pop star Shakira sings
“Imagine there’s no heaven…and no religion, too” in front of “Pope” Francis at
a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly. Shakira performed John
Lennon’s classic anti-religion anthem during the opening ceremony of the 70th
Session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City on Friday,
September 25. She dedicated the song to Aylan and Ghalib Kurdi, two young
Syrian boys who drowned fleeing violence in their home country, declaring:
“Our children have the
right to equal opportunities, to thrive, to be happy and healthy and safe. Now is the time to not just imagine, but do!”
Watch
Shakira here: https://youtu.be/8-3wIW1Rpiw
When a woman asked a Bishop why “Pope”
Francis, during his trip to the United States, failed to mention that marriage is between a man and a
woman, the Bishop responded that the “Holy Father” wanted to avoid a
"negative polemic."
Dr. Dietrich von Hildebrand
refutes this intellectual sophistry. He writes, "Some might be
tempted to believe that the rejection of error and falsehood [ and here, again,
we are speaking of ideas not persons] is something "negative" and
even cult-like....Perhaps never before has there been as much intellectual
fraud as there is today. In the mass media - and even in discussions on
university campuses - this intellectual fraud appears chiefly as the
manipulation of slogans designed to bluff the hearer or reader, and prevent him
from thinking clearly. For a typical example, let us consider how the
terms positive and negative are now most often used to discredit the refutation
of pernicious errors and to give credit to the most shallow speculations. The
intellectual swindlers who play such an important role in public discussions
will often denominate as 'positive' propositions and attitudes they favor. They
thereby seek to forestall questions of truth and value by enveloping their
prejudices in a vague suggestion of 'creativity,' 'originality,' 'openness,'
'unaggressiveness.' This is the device of the cuttlefish. The moment one tries
to grasp it, it emits a murky substance to confuse and deceive.
In reality, the popular slogan
usages of positive and negative is a distortion of the genuine meanings of the
terms. In proper usage they can refer to existence and nonexistence or to value
and disvalue. They can refer to desirability and undesirability, or to answers
to questions and demands, or to results of tests and inquiries. But
when these terms are applied to attitudes of mind or to theses - by way of
suggesting an evaluation - an intellectual fraud is committed; for they are
then being used to evoke vague associations that distract from the question
that alone matters - namely: Is this attitude objectively called for? Or: Is
this thesis true?...It is the nature of truth to exclude every contradiction of
itself. Thus, the rejection of errors and falsehoods can never be separated
from the affirmation of truth. The one implies the other...
To give the impression that
affirmations are 'positive' and denials 'negative' is to misrepresent
completely the nature of judgments and propositions. This abuse of the language
transforms the terms positive and negative into deceptive slogans and thus
amounts to an intellectual swindle..." (The Charitable Anathema, pp.
45-47).
Si palam res est, repetitio
injuria non est: "To say what everybody knows is no injury."
In one of his last homilies,
Archbishop Oscar Romero, the martyred Archbishop of San Salvador [whom Francis
claims to admire], said: "A preaching that does not point out sin is
not the preaching of the gospel. A preaching that makes sinners feel good so
that they become entrenched in their sinful state, betrays the gospel's call. A
preaching that does not discomfit sinners but lulls them in their sin leaves
Zebulun and Naphtali in the shadow of death. A preaching that awakens,
a preaching that enlightens -- as when a light turned on awakens and of course
annoys a sleeper -- that is the preaching of Christ, calling, "wake up! Be
converted!" this is the church's authentic preaching. Naturally, such
preaching must meet conflict, must spoil what is miscalled prestige, must
disturb, must be persecuted. It cannot get along with the powers of darkness
and sin."
Francis has to decide whether he
wants to please men or serve Christ (Galatians 1: 10). I believe he has
already decided.
No comments:
Post a Comment