By
Jonathan Ekene Ifeanyi
A group in the “Church” of England says it will shift the language of worship to call God a female, just to be fair, and to combat sexism, says Berean Research. So instead of praying “Our Father, Who art in heaven”, we will now have to say, “Our Mother, who art in heaven...”
Critics have derided the proposal
as a case of political correctness gone mad.
The “Rev” Emma Percy, chaplain of Trinity College, Oxford,
said the dominance of male language makes women feel that they are less holy.
She is a member of Watch (Women and the Church), the group that helped win the
argument for female “bishops” in the Church of England, and says using the word
‘She’ for God would be “more inclusive.”
The group feels that the ideas of King, Lord and Father are
too “one-sided”: “If we continue to address our worship to an almost
exclusively male God then we are failing God, because God is so much more than
anybody can ever understand.”
The women “priests” behind the
idea argued that using ‘He’ suggests men are closer to God and called for the
tables to be turned on sexism in the “Church.”
+3
The “Rev.” Emma Percy (right) is
among those campaigning to refer to God as 'She' in prayers, hymns, art
and in “church” services.
“When we use only male language
for God we reinforce the idea that God is like a man and, in doing so, suggest
that men are therefore more like God than women,” she told The Sunday Times last week.
“This means that women can see
themselves as less holy and less able to represent Christ in the world. If we
take seriously the idea that men and women are made in the image of God, both
male and female language should be used.”
The Rev Kate Bottley, “vicar” of
St Mary and St Martin’s, in Blyth, Nottinghamshire, told the paper that she and
other “priests” had quietly dropped references to ‘He’ and ‘Him’ when referring
to God.
+3
Gogglebox star and “Vicar”, Kate
Bottley, of St Mary and St Martin's, in Blyth, Nottinghamshire, is among those
who have removed references to 'He' and 'Him' in services where possible.
And Hilary Cotton, chairman of
Watch, said the idea had been discussed by a Lambeth Palace committee exploring
the experiences of women in the “Church”, known as the ‘transformations
steering group’. She added: “We have conversations among that group and we are
working towards working with those who are involved in liturgy in the Church of
England.”
“We are at a very, very
preliminary stage in terms of shifting the language of worship.” She went on to
say: “The question of how might we rewrite the services of the Church of
England in a way that broadens our understanding of God is a difficult question
over which we will wrestle for a number of years. This has arisen now because
of a change in gender culture.”
She said the fact that
Christianity emerged during the Roman empire meant the ideas of King, Lord and
Father were central to the Church, adding: “If we continue to address our
worship to an almost exclusively male God then we are failing God, because God
is so much more than anybody can ever understand.”
The “Reverend” Libby Lane became
the first female “bishop” in a service conducted by the “Archbishop” of York,
John Sentamu, in January.
But she insisted that a female God
was “not a campaigning issue in the same way that getting women bishops was”,
adding: “This is more about experiment. To encourage people to expand their
imagery of God.” A spokesman for Lambeth Palace said: “The transformations
steering group is an independent group made up of women clergy exploring issues
relating to the reception of women in ministry.
“The Archbishop of Canterbury
offers a meeting space at Lambeth Palace, but does not have a formal role in
the group or participate in its discussions. Any change in the formal liturgy
of the Church of England would require consent, revision and final approval of
the General Synod. Even prior to that point, there would need to be substantial
consultation with the Liturgical Commission.”
It is now more than 20 years since
the first woman was “ordained” as a Church of England “priest”, and the first
woman “bishop” – the “Rev.” Libby Lane – was “consecrated” this year.
On Saturday, May 30, Miss
Widdecombe, who left the “Church” of England and became a Catholic over the
decision to ordain women as “priests”, said: “God clearly isn’t a She as a She
can’t be a father. This is plain silly, unbiblical and ridiculous. I think it’s
the work of a few lunatics.”
But any Catholic who thinks this
madness can only be witnessed in the “Church” of England or in other Protestant
“churches” is just deceiving himself. In this regard, particularly on the issue
of women leaders in the Church, defenders of Jorge Bergoglio have always quoted
him: “On the ordination of women, the church has spoken and said no. John Paul
II, in a definitive formulation said that door is closed.”- July 28, 2013.
However, the same Mr. Bergoglio,
ever tactically confusing in his speeches, vomited the following just two
months after:
“It is necessary to broaden the
opportunities for a stronger presence of women in the church. I am wary of a
solution that can be reduced to a kind of ‘female machismo,’
because a woman has a different make-up than a man. But what I hear about the
role of women is often inspired by an ideology of machismo.” –
September 30, 2013, interview with America
Magazine.
“Women are asking deep questions
that must be addressed. The church cannot be herself without the woman and her
role. The woman is essential for the church. Mary, a woman, is more important
than the bishops. I say this because we must not confuse the function with the
dignity. We must therefore investigate further the role of women in the
church. We have to work harder to develop a profound theology of the
woman. Only by making this step will it be possible to better reflect on their
function within the church. The feminine genius is needed wherever we make
important decisions. The challenge today is this: to think about the specific
place of women also in those places where the authority of the church is
exercised for various areas of the church.” - September 30, 2013,
interview with America Magazine.
“The reservation of the priesthood
to males, as a sign of Christ the Spouse who gives himself in the Eucharist, is
not a question open to discussion, but it
can prove especially divisive if sacramental power is too closely identified
with power in general.” –
Evangelii Gaudium, November 24, 2013.
“We need to create still broader
opportunities for a more incisive female presence in the Church. Because “the
feminine genius is needed in all expressions in the life of society, the
presence of women must also be guaranteed in the workplace and in the various
other settings where important decisions are made, both in the Church and in
social structures.” - Evangelii
Gaudium, November 24, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment