27 Feb 2018

Prosperity Gospel: Catholic “mass” now sold for 3 million naira in Eastern Nigeria!

by Jonathan Ekene Ifeanyi

Mbaka
“But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry...” (Jesus Christ: Luke 6:24-25).

Early this month, I travelled to Eastern Nigeria for the burial of my late cousin, Chief Ignatius Chukwuemeka Uzoewulu, which took place in Ukpor, Anambra State. As usual, one of my ugliest encounters was to see the way spiritually blind Novus Ordo priests are ever increasingly messing up the Catholic Church in Eastern Nigeria. Put simply, the priests here — too demonic — are specialists in MONEY or WEALTH. Here, everything about the Faith is being sold. It’s horrible!

Of course, the people themselves — that is, the lay “faithful”, followers of these “priests” — are, like their “priests”, also massively blind spiritually, so as always almost all the people are not even conscious of what is happening; and these evil priests are not being resisted — the people don’t really know that these demonic priests are leading them to nowhere by hell-fire itself!

However, one of my old sisters, Amechi by name, was different. She knows these “priests” for exactly what they are.

“The Catholic Faith brought to us by the European Reverend Fathers exists no longer”, she lamented during our discussion. “Our people — Igbo priests particularly — have sold it”. I was happy to know that there is, at least, someone who sees what I’m seeing, so I pressed her to say further. Then she exploded: “Look at what happened at Ozubulu recently. These devilish priests and the bishop knew that the young man called Aloysius Ikegwuonu did not make his money genuinely. Yet, they allowed him to build a “Catholic Church” and we all witnessed the tragedy that happened at that “Catholic Church”. It happened because Our Lord did not accept that Church (even though these money-loving priests and the bishop did) because it was built with blood money. ...Look at what people like Father Mbaka and Father Chidoruo are doing in the name of our Church and people are keeping quiet. Just buy their cassettes and listen to the abominations coming out of their mouths. Now Father Chidoruo collects three million naira (N3000000) to say mass for each rich man. During his "prosperity mass" you hear of the donations and "Ndi ga'egburu Jesus Ehi" (i.e. those who will kill cow for Jesus). Rich men (many of whom are cult people, drug pushers and others who did so many terrible things to make their money) would line up and start donating. They start donating millions of naira! This Satanic priest doesn't talk about the sins of these people, no. Rather, he tells them that the more they donate, the more God blesses them. There is also the one they do with recharge card. The more you recharge, the more God blesses you! And then the tithes! Do you see that? And the bishop allows these “priests” to operate FREELY! But Jesus does not accept such a mass because you simply can’t sell the mass. It’s unacceptable. ...The fact that nobody cares to challenge these devilish priests is the reason why there are different calamities in our land, because God is not happy with us.”

Amechi also mentioned one other priest (I’ve forgotten the name) who, like Fathers Chidoruo, Mbaka and others, was collecting money from the people and was believed by them to be a miracle worker until he recently impregnated a woman. “After that abomination many of his followers realised that he was fake, so they stopped following him”, she said. “Yet, they are still following the likes of Fathers Chidoruo and Mbaka. Well it may be too late for them if they are waiting for these ones too to also impregnate women before they open their eyes, because that may not happen”.

I agreed perfectly with Amechi, and added that as far as people continue to do all this evil in the name of Christ more sufferings will come to Nigerians — especially money-worshipping Igbos — and many people will die.

Well, I have already written about this sad situation — this “prosperity gospel” — in my article, NIGERIAN “PASTORS” AND THEIR PROSPERITY “GOSPEL”As I stated there, formerly prosperity gospel was peculiar to the “Pentecostal Pastors”, but today even many “Catholic priests” — like “Father” Mbaka and many others — have joined the race. So many of the lay “faithful” have also joined the race — having been corrupted by the modernist Vatican II Church which is simply going crazy with anything worldly! Today, following the Vatican II Revolution, the love of God has simply vanished from many hearts, and replaced with the love of selves. So many people, who still bear the Christian name, love themselves and their “possessions” above all things. This comes in different forms — many love their wives more than God, others their husbands and others even their beautiful cars and houses. How can men and women with such a mentality know anything about our poor Christ who makes it very clear that to follow Him one must put God first in all things, and carry his or her cross DAILY?

Today in Nigeria, at least over 90 percent of the entire “Catholic priests”, just like the Pentecostals, pollute the churches EVERYDAY with prosperity gospel. They are demonic. Whether you’re in the East, in Lagos or Abuja, theyre just the same. What they studied in the Satanic seminaries is just how to exploit the Church. And they're simply skilled in this act! In Lagos for instance what is reigning now is “renovation” of (the spiritually empty) churches. Try listening carefully to that your parish priest and you will see that what he spends more time preaching always is about “projects” — about building or renovating this or that Church and NOT about salvation of souls. Suffering is simply not for these men, as they seek comforts at all costs and can do anything — anything — to get these comforts. In Lagos almost all the churches are now air-conditioned! In some Pentecostal “churches” if people can’t get comforts (like air-condition and things like that) they simply won’t go to “church”. That is exactly what these devilish priests have turned the Catholic Churches into. Of course the devil himself brings these comforts in order to reduce the spirituality of people — because the more the physical comforts, the less the spiritual commitment of people. Churches like Our Lady of Perpetual Help Catholic Church (located at Victoria Island) and Church of the Assumption (located at Falomo in Ikoyi) are now worse than Pentecostal “churches”. During mass in these places you can even see lovers holding hands and caressing one another, others talking and chatting and doing all sorts of rubbish. But we know that these are not Catholic gatherings, because in a Catholic gathering — first and foremost — men and women are separated, and people don’t come to Church to seek comforts but to pray and ask for God’s forgiveness of their sins and those of the world. Look at the Muslims! Even the worst sinners among them don’t go to the mosques to seek comforts but to pray, and once they’re there, you see absolute respect — absolute respect — for Allah! When you see their women — the way they dress, the hair well covered, etc. — you see Our Lady! Quite contrarily when you see most Catholic women today you see harlots. Of course, this attitude of the Muslims was actually the attitude of the early Christians, but today if you dare try it in Novus Ordo Churches it is the priest himself who will be the first to mock you.
                                                 
When we compare the prosperous lives of these Nigerian “priests” to those of the poor European Reverend Fathers who brought Christianity to Nigeria, you will weep! As I wrote in the article, Mbaka: A Man Of God Or Just An Impostor? (2), “prosperity gospel” preachers “like Ejike Mbaka will always utter rubbish in order to dupe gullible people and get away with their crimes only because there are no true prophets in Nigeria, because there are no true Elijahs who can slaughter them just the way Prophet Elijah slaughtered the false prophets of Baal, and because those in government are equally spiritually blind. This spiritual blindness is simply responsible for the reality that “churches” (like Mbaka’s Adoration Ministry which is not Catholic) and mosques are expanding exponentially in Nigeria, yet the country is paradoxically at rock bottom in morality. It rankles that Nigeria is ranked as the most religious country in the world and contradictorily ranks among the top dogs too in the corruption index.

No need of writing a new article on their prosperity gospel. The following excerpts — which demonstrate without reasonable doubt that Nigerian “Christians”, “Catholics” or Pentecostals, serve the devil — are taken from my article, NIGERIAN “PASTORS” AND THEIR PROSPERITY “GOSPEL”:

...As St Paul puts it, “If we have died with Him, we shall also rise with Him”.  Jesus makes this very clear as we see in several places in the Gospels. First of all, we see His response to those who wished to follow Him, in the Gospel according to St Matthew (8:19-22):     

“Then a certain scribe came and said to Him, “Teacher, I will follow You wherever You go”. And Jesus said to him, “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head”. Then another of His disciples said to Him, “Lord, let me first go and bury my father”. But Jesus said to him, Follow Me, and let the dead bury their own dead”.     
     
Again, He makes us know that His true followers would be very few, who would follow the thorny road that leads to heaven, as we read (Matt.7:13-14):

“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it”.

Here our Lord remarkably indicates to us that this way of suffering is what many will never accept, but only a very few — even as we witness in today’s world, in Nigeria.

Again, in the Gospel according to St Mark, we see the drama that took place when Jesus taught His disciples that the Son of Man must suffer many things, be rejected, and finally, be killed — immediately, Simon Peter, like modern “Christians”, took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, as we read (Mark 8: 31-38):

“And He began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things, and be rejected by the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. He spoke this word openly. Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him. But when He had turned around and looked at His disciples, He rebuked Peter, saying, ‘Get behind Me, Satan! For you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.  When He had called the people to Himself, with His disciples also, He said to them, “Whoever wishes to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake and the gospel’s will save it. For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him the Son of Man also will be ashamed when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels”.

The cross, which the Lord talks about in the above passage, is a symbol of suffering, a suffering which the Master Himself first endured. The way of this cross, He tells us, is the very way that leads to eternal life. In fact, from the biblical point of view, anyone who claims to have accepted the Christian Faith, while rejecting this cross, cannot be saved. 

Thus when Peter rebuked Him for saying that He would suffer many things, Jesus did not waste time to call him Satan. Tragically, this Satanic attitude of rejecting the cross while claiming to be Christians, is what today rules millions of “Christians”, millions of Nigerian “Christians”!

In Nigeria, David Oyedepo, Matthew Ashimolowo, Ayo Oritsejafor, Chris Oyakhilome and Chris Okotie are perfect examples of “powerful pastors” who have been materially blessed and who can joyfully boast of these blessings. But St Paul contradicts them. ‘‘…God forbid that I should boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ’’, he writes, ‘‘by whom the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world’’ (Gal.6:14). Again, ‘‘I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and  the life which I now live in the flesh  I live by faith in the Son  of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me’’ (Gal. 2:20).

Can there be any real fellowship between the man who makes these kinds of statements and the ‘‘pastors’’ just mentioned above?

Again, on paying of tithe, which today is being used by “Catholic” priests and Pentecostal “pastors” to rub the poor, Our Lord speaks, prophetically to the modern clergy (Luke 11: 42-44):

“But woe to you, Pharisees, because you tithe mint and rue and every herb; and pass over judgment, and the charity of God. Now these things you ought to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Woe to you, Pharisees, because you love the uppermost seats in the synagogues, and salutations in the market place. Woe to you, because you are as sepulchres that appear not, and men that walk over are not aware.”

The Greek word “ἀποδεκατοῦτε” (apodekatoute) means ‘you take tithe from’, ‘you tithe’. The Pharisees, like today’s Catholic clergy, neglected to talk about judgment, and the true charity of God, but preached extensively about paying of tithes. The idea of using tithe to dupe the faithful was copied by the Catholic clergy from Pentecostal “pastors” — who promise their victims that after paying their tithes, their sufferings would be over and God would turn them into millionaires!

“Pentecostal Pastors” (and demon-possessed “priests” like “Father” Mbaka) claim to be Christians, and shout the name of Christ everywhere, but, in reality, they are sworn enemies of the Christian Faith. Their Christianity is all about the enjoyment of the present world, and nothing can prevent them from this enjoyment. In fact, were Jesus to come back to this world to preach the message of the cross, these “Christians”, unlike the Jews, will not crucify Him just once, but indeed, a million times.

St Paul already spoke about them in the first century (Phil. 3: 17-20), as we read:

“Be ye followers of me, brethren, and observe them who walk so as you have our model. For many walk, of whom I have told you often (and now tell you weeping), that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ; whose end is destruction; whose God is their belly; and whose glory is in their shame; who mind earthly things. But our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, our Lord Jesus Christ”.   

In other words, true Christians must always look up to heaven, where “our conversation is…”, says St Paul. They must have nothing to do with the enemies of the cross of Christ, “whose end is destruction; whose God is their belly; and whose glory is in their shame…”

Nigerian “Pentecostal Pastors” (and Novus Ordo “Catholic priests”) do not look up to heaven. On the contrary, they are completely earthly-minded. For example, in the posters and sign boards they display about their “churches”, it is always all about them, their wives, and their wealth, not Jesus Christ!  Of course, Christ’s words are simply prophetic, for we read again, in St Luke’s Gospel (Luke 14: 26-27):

“If anyone comes to Me, and does not hate his father and his mother, and his wife, and his children, and his brother, and his sister, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple. Anyone who cannot carry his cross and follow Me, cannot be my disciple”. 

Is Christ addressing these words to the Catholics who believe in a Christianity of suffering or the Protestants and false Catholics like “Father” Mbaka who believe in a Christianity of enjoyment?  

In the entire New Testament, from the Gospel of St Mathew to the Revelation, there is no place where either Jesus or His Apostles promised riches to those who would accept the Christian faith. Even in the Old Testament, a man like Solomon, the richest man in Jerusalem, became rich only because he never prayed for that but for the gift of wisdom. It was Solomon’s faith — his asking for wisdom instead of wealth — that attracted God’s attention to him and made Him to bless him, just as Abraham’s faith attracted God’s immense blessings. Again, St Paul contradicts these lovers of money who now claim to have Abraham’s blessings. He writes (cf. Gal. 3: 7):

“Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham. And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, ‘‘In you all the nations shall be blessed. So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham’’”.

The few rich people we see in the Old Testament — Solomon, Job, etc — were all men of faith. Solomon sought first the wisdom of God and God then decided to enrich him materially. But the same Solomon, at the end of it all, tells us that even his wealth was all vanity upon vanity. It was the same wisdom of God which never departed from him that led him to realize that. We now invite him to testify for himself:

“I said to myself, ‘‘Come now, I will make a taste of pleasure; enjoy yourself’’. But again, this also was vanity. I said of laughter, ‘‘It is mad’’, and of pleasure, ‘‘What use is it?’’ I searched with my mind how to cheer my body with wine — my mind still guiding me with wisdom — and how to lay hold on folly, until I might see what was good for mortals to do under heaven during the few days of their life. I made great works; I built houses and planted vineyards for myself; I made myself gardens and parks, and planted in them all kinds of fruit trees. I made myself pools from which to water the forest of growing trees; I bought male and female slaves, and had slaves who were born in my house; I also had great possessions of herds and flocks, more than any who had been before me in Jerusalem. I also gathered for myself silver and gold and the treasure of kings and of the provinces; I got singers, both men and women, and delights of the flesh, and many concubines”.

“So I became great and surpassed all who were before me in Jerusalem; also my wisdom remained with me. Whatever my eyes desired I did not keep from them; I kept my heart from no pleasure, for my heart found pleasure in all my toil, and this was my reward for all my toil. Then I considered all that my hands had done and the toil I had spent in doing it, and again, all was vanity and a chasing after wind, and there was nothing to be gained under the sun”.

Thus, like Christ, Solomon, the richest man is Jerusalem, here tells us that it was “all vanity and a chasing after wind, and there was nothing to be gained under the sun”.

The Gospels, as we have been demonstrating, are full of Christ’s admonitions to His followers about the deceitfulness of the riches of this world. In these Gospels, He teaches us that, what God wants from all human beings is not really to be successful, but to be faithful.     

In the story of the rich young man, for instance, we read (Mark 18:18-25):

“Now a certain ruler asked Him, saying, ‘Good teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?’ So Jesus said to him, “…You know the commandments: ‘Do not commit adultery’, ‘Do not murder’, ‘Do not steal’, ‘Do not bear false witness’, ‘Honour your father and your mother’” And he said, “All these things I have kept from my youth”. So when Jesus heard these things, He said to Him, “You still lack one thing. Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me”. But when he heard this, he became very sorrowful, for he was very rich. And when Jesus saw that he became very sorrowful, He said, “How hard it is for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God! For it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God”. 

Here we notice carefully that Jesus does not say that all rich people will go to hell, no. But He makes it clear that it will be very difficult for them to go to heaven. This is the core message of Christ in this passage — despite the false interpretations given to this passage by modern fake pastors. Of course there are many rich people who are more righteous than some poor people. But here Jesus is not talking about that. What Our Lord attacks, rather, is the main virus ‘‘rich’’ or ‘‘wealth’’ — for there is actually something sinful even in the mere desire of it. If all Christians are meant to be rich, as Satanic preachers tell us today, why did Christ, the Master Himself, choose to be poor? Where on the face of this earth can we find a master who wallows in abject poverty while his servants wallow in wealth? Certainly, a typical “Pentecostal” will answer that Christ chose to be poor in order that we might be rich. Excellent! But if so, what about His early followers? Can we find a single man among them who, having accepted the Christian faith, did not embrace poverty for the sake of Christ?

In fact, we need not dwell so much on this topic. We see Christ’s teaching on how a Christian should live in this world in the Gospel according to St Matthew (6: 25; 31-34):

“Therefore I say to you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food and the body more than clothing? ...Therefore, do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For after these things the Gentiles seek. For your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about its own things. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble”.

The above teaching corresponds with what He taught us in the Lord’s Prayer: “Give us this day our daily bread”, not “give us these days”! Protestants, of course, do not say the prayer this way. In their famous King James Version, this verse of the Bible is simply translated as “Give us day by day our daily bread”! (c.f. Luke 11: 3) The Greek passage of the same verse reads: “τὸν ἄρτον ἡμῶν τὸν ἐπιούσιον δίδου ἡμῖν τὸ καθ' ἡμέραν.” The word “τὸ καθ' ἡμέραν” means “this day”, not “day by day”! In the Latin translation what we have is “Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie.” Here again the word “hodie” simply means “this day”, or “today”, not “day by day”! Who inspired Protestants to change the word of God from “today” or “this day” to “day by day”? How can Our Lord, who asks us not to worry about tomorrow, recommend such a prayer? 

Christ, in the Gospel according to St Mark quoted above, said to the rich young man, ‘‘Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me”. Did He say that merely because the man loved his wealth more than the things of God, as modern preachers now interpret it?  As we pointed out above, what our Lord attacked was only the virus ‘rich’ or ‘wealth’, the very root of all evils, not the individual rich people. Now, Christ counters these prosperity preachers by repeating (and in fact, emphasizing more on) the same statement in the following passage in the Gospel according to St Matthew (6: 19-21):

“Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal; but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also”.

Again, (in verse 24), He says,

“No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and Mammon”.

The word ‘‘Mammon’’ is from the Greek word Μαμωνᾷς (‘’Mamona’’), which in the New Testament is begun with the Greek small letter mu, ‘‘μ’’ (‘‘μαμωνᾷ’’). ‘‘Mamona’’ in the New Testament is a personification of wealth and greed as a false god, used in opposition to the Almighty God (cf. Luke 16:13). In some Bible versions it is translated as simply ‘‘money’’, but that is not exactly accurate. Originally, Mamona or Mammon is the name of the Syrian god of riches who is also the god of the underworld. The Latin counterpart is Pluto, god of the dead, the husband of Proserpine. The Latin counterpart of the Greek Hades, Pluto — in Roman mythology — assisted his two brothers, Jupiter and Neptune, in overthrowing their father, Saturn. In dividing the world among them, Jupiter chose the earth and the heavens as his realm, Neptune became the ruler of the sea, and Pluto received as his kingdom the lower world, in which he ruled over the shades of the dead. Believed to be the bestower of the blessings hidden in the earth, such as mineral wealth and crops, Pluto was also known as Dis or Orcus, the giver of wealth.

The word ‘‘riches’’ or ‘‘wealth’’ in Greek means πλοτος (Plutus). From plutus (πλοῦτος) came the English word ‘‘plutocrat’’ — a person who is powerful because of his wealth, and ‘‘plutocracy’’ — government by the richest people of a country, or a country governed by the richest people in it.

From πλοῦτος (plutus) came the Greek god Πλούτος (Plutus), who is a personification of wealth. The Greek counterpart of the Syrian Μαμωνᾷς (‘‘Mammon’’), Plutus (Πλούτος) was the name of Hades, derived, as stated above, from πλοῦτος meaning ‘’wealth’’, ‘‘riches’’, because corn, the wealth of early times, was sent from beneath the earth as the gift of the god. In the earliest times, various polytheistic gods had their various functions. Plutus (Πλούτος) or Mammon (Μαμωνᾷς), was simply the name of the god responsible for making people rich. Hence when Christ says, ‘‘οὐ δύνασθε θεῷ δουλεύειν καὶ μαμωνᾷ’’ (‘‘You cannot serve God and Mammon’’), He means that we cannot serve the true, living God, who is mainly after our righteousness and salvation, and the pagan, Satanic god, who promises riches as a way of enticing men and holding them captive. Since the word also means ‘wealth’, ‘riches’, we can also translate the passage as simply ‘‘You cannot serve God and wealth’’. The Greek passage reads:

“οὐδεὶς δύναται δυσὶ κυρίοις δουλεύειν: ἢ γὰρ τὸν ἕνα μισήσει καὶ τὸν ἕτερον ἀγαπήσει, ἢ ἑνὸς ἀνθέξεται καὶ τοῦ ἑτέρου καταφρονήσει: οὐ δύνασθε θεῷ δουλεύειν καὶ μαμωνᾷ’’.

Translated:

“No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and Mammon”. (ibid. verse 24)

Jesus’ teaching can be summarized in His following words, written in St John’s Gospel (Jn. 12: 25): “He who loves his life will lose it, and he who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life.”

The early Christians, many of whom are saints today, hated their lives in this world, and hence passed through sufferings.  After the ascension of Christ into heaven, they did not selfishly assume that the Lord had done it all for them; and that all that remained was for them to enjoy themselves, or that “It is finished” meant suffering was all over. On the contrary, they remained faithful enough to remember His words, “A disciple is not above his teacher. If they persecute Me, they will also persecute you” (Matt. 10:24). Hence Stephen was brutally stoned to death by the Jews for preaching and practising the Christian faith; Simon Peter, the first Pope, was brutally crucified; St Paul was beheaded—and so on. Apart from these earliest followers of Christ, down the centuries, there are countless cases of faithful men and women — all Catholics — who simply sacrificed their lives for the sake of Christ’s Gospel. Also, we have countless number of cases of rich men and women who abandoned their wealth and chose poverty, all for the sake of Christ’s Gospel — something simply unthinkable even to the “holiest” Christians in today’s world. Contrary to the Protestant error that Christ has suffered in order for us to be rich, our  Lord Jesus Christ expects us to imitate Him in all things—His life of holiness, His zeal in doing good, His rejection of worldly riches, His choosing of poverty, and, in fact, even His martyrdom for the salvation of His brethren!

Indeed, what some call “the gospel of prosperity” is simply not in the Bible and people who preach that are purely serving their master, the devil. From the Gospel according to St Matthew to the Revelation, nothing like that truly exists. In fact, rather than blessing the rich people of His time, as modern false teachers do, Our Lord spent a great deal of time and energy denouncing them. We end this topic with one of such — blessings and woes addressed by Christ Himself to the rich and the poor:

“Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. Blessed are you when people hate you, and when they exclude you, revile you, and defame you on account of the Son of Man. Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, for surely your reward is great in heaven; for that is what their ancestors did to the prophets. But woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation. Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry. Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep. Woe to you when all speak well of you, for that is what their ancestors did to the false prophets” (Luke 6:20-26).      

Related: 

23 Feb 2018

Why didn’t Cardinal Sarah mention John Paul II as the greatest promoter of communion in the hand?

by Jonathan Ekene Ifeanyi
John Paul II giving communion in the hand! 
The article below is against the abomination of receiving Holy Communion in the hand. Yet it reads partly: Sarah goes on to consider how faith in the Real Presence “can influence the way we receive Communion, and vice versa,” and he proposes Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa as two modern saints whom God has given us to imitate in their reverence and reception of the Holy Eucharist.”

This statement prompted me to ask questions: what’s actually wrong with many people of this generation that they simply can’t make a sound moral judgement? That they often contradict themselves when it comes to making moral judgements? Mortal sins? Indeed it could be! As I once wrote in my Open Letter To Catholic Archbishop of Lagos (when I was still struggling with demonic Novus Ordo priests and bishops on issues like this), “Communion in the hand was mostly promoted by Vatican II’s John Paul II, a man who, as I write, some Catholic pundits all over the world are still debating whether he was even a Catholic in the first place, let alone a pope...”

As the photo above shows, John Paul II simply promoted communion in the hand more than anyone else you can possibly think of. Why didn't Cardinal Sarah mention this in the new book?  

Note also that the Cardinal does not cite important Church teachings on the subject, l
ike Pope St. Sixtus I (circa 115 AD), who taught that “the Sacred Vessels are not to be handled by others than those consecrated to the Lord” — meaning that it is actually only a validly ordained priest (whose hand has been consecrated for this very purpose) that is qualified to give Holy Communion to the faithful. (See my "Open Letter" cited above). He didn’t also tell us, as the Open Letter reads, that “The Council of Saragossa (380) excommunicated anyone who dared receive Holy Communion by hand, and this was confirmed by the Synod of Toledo. The sixth Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (680-681) forbade the faithful to take the Sacred Host in their hand, threatening transgressors with excommunication. In his famous Summa Theologica, St. Thomas Aquinas wrote: “Out of reverence towards this Sacrament (the Holy Eucharist), nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest’s hands, for touching this sacrament. Hence, it is not lawful for anyone else to touch it except from necessity, for instance, if it were to fall upon the ground, or else in some other case of urgency” (Summa Theologica, III, 82, 3). In the sixteenth century, the Council of Trent confirmed this: “The fact that only the priest gives Holy Communion is an Apostolic Tradition.”

Instead, the Cardinal is proposing “Saints” John Paul II  (John Paul II who also initiated giving communion to Protestants!) and (demonic) Mother Teresa as “two modern saints whom God has given us to imitate in their reverence and reception of the Holy Eucharist.” Only mad men and women can take him seriously.
 
The article:

 
 
Cardinal Sarah: Widespread Communion in the hand is part of Satan’s attack on the Eucharist

by Diane Montagna
Fr. Lawrence Lew, OP / Flick

ROME, February 22, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) — The head of the Vatican department overseeing liturgy is summoning the Catholic faithful to return to receiving Holy Communion on the tongue and kneeling.

In the preface to a new book on the subject, Cardinal Robert Sarah, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship, writes: “The most insidious diabolical attack consists in trying to extinguish faith in the Eucharist, by sowing errors and fostering an unsuitable way of receiving it. Truly the war between Michael and his Angels on one side, and Lucifer on the other, continues in the hearts of the faithful.”

“Satan’s target is the Sacrifice of the Mass and the Real Presence of Jesus in the consecrated Host,” he said.

The new book, by Don Federico Bortoli, was released in Italian under the title: ‘The distribution of Communion on the hand: a historical, juridical and pastoral survey’ [La distribuzione della comunione sulla mano. Profili storici, giuridici e pastorali].

Recalling the centenary of the Fatima apparitions, Sarah writes that the Angel of Peace who appeared to the three shepherd children in advance of the Blessed Virgin’s visit “shows us how we should receive the Body and the Blood of Jesus Christ.” His Eminence then identifies the outrages by which Jesus is offended today in the Holy Eucharist, including “so-called ‘intercommunion.’”

Sarah goes on to consider how faith in the Real Presence “can influence the way we receive Communion, and vice versa,” and he proposes Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa as two modern saints whom God has given us to imitate in their reverence and reception of the Holy Eucharist.

“Why do we insist on receiving Communion standing and on the hand?,” the Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship asks. The manner in which the Holy Eucharist is distributed and received, he writes, “is an important question on which the Church today must reflect.”

Here below, with the kind permission of La Nuova Bussola where the preface was first published, we offer our readers a LifeSiteNews translation of several key extracts from Cardinal Sarah’s text.  
***
Providence, which disposes all thing wisely and sweetly, has offered us book The Distribution of Communion on the hand, by Federico Bortoli, just after having celebrated the centenary of the Fatima apparitions. Before the apparition of the Virgin Mary, in the Spring of 1916, the Angel of Peace appeared to Lucia, Jacinta and Francisco, and said to them: “Do not be afraid, I am the Angel of Peace. Pray with me.” (...) In the Spring of 1916, at the third apparition of the Angel, the children realized that the Angel, who was always the same one, held in his left hand a chalice over which a host was suspended. (...) He gave the holy Host to Lucia, and the Blood of the chalice to Jacinta and Francisco, who remained on their knees, saying: “Take and drink the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, horribly outraged by ungrateful men. Make reparation for their crimes and console your God.” The Angel prostrated himself again on the ground, repeating the same prayer three times with Lucia, Jacinta and Francisco.

The Angel of Peace therefore shows us how we should receive the Body and the Blood of Jesus Christ. The prayer of reparation dictated by the Angel, unfortunately, is anything but obsolete. But what are the outrages that Jesus receives in the holy Host, for which we need to make reparation? In the first place, there are the outrages against the Sacrament itself: the horrible profanations, of which some ex-Satanist converts have reported and offer gruesome descriptions. Sacrilegious Communions, not received in the state of God’s grace, or not professing the Catholic faith (I refer to certain forms of the so-called “intercommunion”), are also outrages. Secondly, all that could prevent the fruitfulness of the Sacrament, especially the errors sown in the minds of the faithful so that they no longer believe in the Eucharist, is an outrage to Our Lord. The terrible profanations that take place in the so-called ‘black masses’ do not directly wound the One who in the Host is wronged, ending only in the accidents of bread and wine.

Of course, Jesus suffers for the souls of those who profane Him, and for whom He shed the Blood which they so miserably and cruelly despise. But Jesus suffers more when the extraordinary gift of his divine-human Eucharistic Presence cannot bring its potential effects into the souls of believers. And so we can understand that the most insidious diabolical attack consists in trying to extinguish faith in the Eucharist, by sowing errors and fostering an unsuitable way of receiving it. Truly the war between Michael and his Angels on one side, and lucifer on the other, continues in the hearts of the faithful: Satan’s target is the Sacrifice of the Mass and the Real Presence of Jesus in the consecrated Host. This robbery attempt follows two tracks: the first is the reduction of the concept of ‘real presence.’ Many theologians persist in mocking or snubbing the term ‘transubstantiation’ despite the constant references of the Magisterium (…)

Let us now look at how faith in the real presence can influence the way we receive Communion, and vice versa. Receiving Communion on the hand undoubtedly involves a great scattering of fragments. On the contrary, attention to the smallest crumbs, care in purifying the sacred vessels, not touching the Host with sweaty hands, all become professions of faith in the real presence of Jesus, even in the smallest parts of the consecrated species: if Jesus is the substance of the Eucharistic Bread, and if the dimensions of the fragments are accidents only of the bread, it is of little importance how big or small a piece of the Host is! The substance is the same! It is Him! On the contrary, inattention to the fragments makes us lose sight of the dogma. Little by little the thought may gradually prevail: “If even the parish priest does not pay attention to the fragments, if he administers Communion in such a way that the fragments can be scattered, then it means that Jesus is not in them, or that He is ‘up to a certain point’.”

The second track on which the attack against the Eucharist runs is the attempt to remove the sense of the sacred from the hearts of the faithful. (...) While the term ‘transubstantiation’ points us to the reality of presence, the sense of the sacred enables us to glimpse its absolute uniqueness and holiness. What a misfortune it would be to lose the sense of the sacred precisely in what is most sacred! And how is it possible? By receiving special food in the same way as ordinary food. (…)

The liturgy is made up of many small rituals and gestures — each of them is capable of expressing these attitudes filled with love, filial respect and adoration toward God. That is precisely why it is appropriate to promote the beauty, fittingness and pastoral value of a practice which developed during the long life and tradition of the Church, that is, the act of receiving Holy Communion on the tongue and kneeling. The greatness and nobility of man, as well as the highest expression of his love for his Creator, consists in kneeling before God. Jesus himself prayed on his knees in the presence of the Father. (…)

In this regard I would like to propose the example of two great saints of our time: St. John Paul II and St. Teresa of Calcutta. Karol Wojtyła’s entire life was marked by a profound respect for the Holy Eucharist. (...) Despite being exhausted and without strength (...) he always knelt before the Blessed Sacrament. He was unable to kneel and stand up alone. He needed others to bend his knees and to get up. Until his last days, he wanted to offer us a great witness of reverence for the Blessed Sacrament. Why are we so proud and insensitive to the signs that God himself offers us for our spiritual growth and our intimate relationship with Him? Why do not we kneel down to receive Holy Communion after the example of the saints? Is it really so humiliating to bow down and remain kneeling before the Lord Jesus Christ? And yet, “He, though being in the form of God, [...] humbled himself and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross” (Phil 2: 6-8).

St. Mother Teresa of Calcutta, an exceptional religious who no one would dare regard as a traditionalist, fundamentalist or extremist, whose faith, holiness and total gift of self to God and the poor are known to all, had a respect and absolute worship of the divine Body of Jesus Christ. Certainly, she daily touched the “flesh” of Christ in the deteriorated and suffering bodies of the poorest of the poor. And yet, filled with wonder and respectful veneration, Mother Teresa refrained from touching the transubstantiated Body of Christ. Instead, she adored him and contemplated him silently, she remained at length on her knees and prostrated herself before Jesus in the Eucharist. Moreover, she received Holy Communion in her mouth, like a little child who has humbly allowed herself to be fed by her God.

The saint was saddened and pained when she saw Christians receiving Holy Communion in their hands. In addition, she said that as far as she knew, all of her sisters received Communion only on the tongue. Is this not the exhortation that God himself addresses to us: “I am the Lord your God, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt. Open your mouth wide, and I will fill it”? (Ps 81:10).

Why do we insist on receiving Communion standing and on the hand? Why this attitude of lack of submission to the signs of God? May no priest dare to impose his authority in this matter by refusing or mistreating those who wish to receive Communion kneeling and on the tongue. Let us come as children and humbly receive the Body of Christ on our knees and on our tongue. The saints give us the example. They are the models to be imitated that God offers us!

But how could the practice of receiving the Eucharist on the hand become so common? The answer is given to us — and is supported by never-before-published documentation that is extraordinary in its quality and volume — by Don Bortoli. It was a process that was anything but clear, a transition from what the instruction Memoriale Domini granted, to what is such a widespread practice today (...) Unfortunately, as with the Latin language, so also with a liturgical reform that should have been homogeneous with the previous rites, a special concession has become the picklock to force and empty the safe of the Church’s liturgical treasures. The Lord leads the just along ‘straight paths’ (cf. Wis. 10:10), not by subterfuge. Therefore, in addition to the theological motivations shown above, also the way in which the practice of Communion on the hand has spread appears to have been imposed not according to the ways of God.

May this book encourage those priests and faithful who, moved also by the example of Benedict XVI — who in the last years of his pontificate wanted to distribute the Eucharist in the mouth and kneeling — wish to administer or receive the Eucharist in this latter manner, which is far more suited to the Sacrament itself. I hope there can be a rediscovery and promotion of the beauty and pastoral value of this method. In my opinion and judgment, this is an important question on which the Church today must reflect. This is a further act of adoration and love that each of us can offer to Jesus Christ. I am very pleased to see so many young people who choose to receive our Lord so reverently on their knees and on their tongues. May Fr. Bortoli’s work foster a general rethinking on the way Holy Communion is distributed. As I said at the beginning of this preface, we have just celebrated the centenary of Fatima and we are encouraged in waiting for the sure triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary that, in the end, the truth about the liturgy will also triumph.

* Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments

4 Feb 2018

Old Testament filled with violence just like the Koran?

An enquiry

by Jonathan Ekene Ifeanyi

Francis and Muslims reading the Koran
Few days ago, I tried contrasting “Pope” Francis’ teaching on the Koran with what we truly find in the Koran. I posted my comments on a certain facebook page (named, Protestant, Orthodox and Catholic Discourse). The attack I got will shock you! I was vigorously attacked by both Catholics and Protestants who dismissed my post with the assertion that “both the Old Testament and the Koran are filled with violence”. Unfortunately before I could post further comments to counter them, I was already “suspended”! 

Here was what I posted:

“Francis: “...for authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Quran are opposed to every form of violence.”  (Amoris, paragraph #253.

“Quran: (Sura 9 verse 123): “O you who believe! Fight those of disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find hardness in you; and know that Allah is with those who are Al-Muttaqun (the pious).”

“Quran: (Sura 2:193; 2: 244): “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah). And fight in the way of Allah and know that Allah is All-Hearer, All-knower.”

“Quran: (Sura 47 verse 4): “So, when you meet (in fight—Jihad in Allah’s Cause) those who disbelieve, smite (their) necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them…”

Michael Stratton was the first to “counter” me. Unfortunately I can’t quote his exact comments here because before I could respond to him I was already “suspended” and the post itself was deleted! But he did so by quoting the Book of Numbers (Chapter 31 where such “violence” is located!). His point — and the point of others as well — was that both the Old Testament and the Koran are “filled with violence” — therefore I must shut up!

Below was the answer I wanted to post before I was “suspended”:

Anyway, Michael Stratton, here is my response to your “Violence in the Old Testament” (I pray they won’t delete it as well!):

First of all you demonstrated clearly that you are NOT a Christian. If you are, you should have known that EVERY SINGLE KILLING IN THE OLD TESTAMENT IS JUSTIFIABLE BECAUSE THEY WERE ORDERED BY GOD – WHEREAS THE KILLINGS IN THE KORAN ARE SIMPLY DEMONIC BECAUSE THEY WERE ORDERED BY THE DEVIL.

You remind me of Michael Hardman (another Michael but a sincere one!) who once raised the same question. He said:

“Jonathan - "every single killing of a human being in the O.T. is perfectly justifiable". Hmm.

“Is it justifiable, when the Israelites complained that too many people were being killed, then to send a plague that kills 14,700 more? (Numbers 16: 41-49)

“Is it justifiable for the Israelites to kill all the Midianites (save for the virgins, who they were allowed to rape)? (Numbers 31: 7-18)

“Is it justifiable to kill 50,070 men for looking into the ark of the covenant? (1 Samuel 6: 19)
“Is it justifiable for 42 boys to be torn up by bears for mocking Elisha? (2 Kings 2: 23-24)”

And here was my response:

“If you really believe in God, Michael, then I expect you to be wise in your "reasoning". But I would have no problem with the said "reasoning" if you don't.

“Every single killing in the O.T. (i.e. those authorised by God) is PERFECTLY JUSTIFIABLE. But the killings authorised by Allah in the Quran (such as killing everyone who refuses to convert) are not just questionable — they're demonic.

“First of all, in the Old Testament anyone who sinned against God was given instant judgement — often killing. Today (under the New Testament) all who sin against God will also receive their just punishment but in the next life — though some do receive part of those punishments here on earth as well. So the situation (in the Old and new Testaments) is basically the same. It doesn't matter how long bad people live on this earth — once they die they face the reality. Hence Christ said: "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfil them. For I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.…" (Matthew 5:17-18).

“That said, in Numbers 16: 41-49 a man called Core and his adherents committed a very serious sin: they revolted against two servants of God — humble Moses himself and Aaron the priest! In fact, their sin is similar to the sin of today’s Protestants: they wanted Moses and Aron (anointed servants of God) to stop being their leaders and declared that all the people should lead themselves! That all the people should be priests and prophets as well! This was (probably) the first sin of schism! Like most people in this era, they blasphemed the Lord. So they were justifiably punished by God. “And the Lord speaking to Moses and Aaron, said: separate yourselves from among this congregation, that I may presently destroy them.” (Numbers 16:20-21).

“Moses addressed the people, and scripture says that immediately after Moses had finished speaking, “the earth broke asunder under their feet: And opening her mouth, devoured them with their tent and all their substance. And they went down alive into hell, the ground closing upon them, and they perished from among the people.” (Ibid. 31-33). Those that offered incense following Core (250 of them) were also destroyed (by fire), so also those who later accused Moses of killing Core and his adherents (14,700). As for the faithful Israelites, Aaron prayed for them and the plague stopped. (Ibid. 41-49).

“In Numbers 31: 7-18 the Midianites were slain for having drawn the people of Israel into sin. You’re lying by saying that they raped the Midianite women! The Israelites did not rape their women. The scripture says: “And they took their women, and their children captives...” (Numbers 31:9). Moses of course rebuked them for this: “And Moses being angry with the chief officers of the army, the tribunes, and the centurions that were come from the battle, said: Why have you saved the women? Are not these they, that deceived the children of Israel by the counsel of Balaam, and made you transgress against the Lord by the sin of Phogor, for which also the people was punished? Therefore kill all that are of the male sex, even of the children: and put to death the women, that have carnally known men. But the girls, and all the women that are virgins save for yourselves.” (Numbers 31:14-18). They were to MARRY—and not to RAPE—those virgins, something common in those days. So what’s your problem with that?

““Is it justifiable to kill 50,070 men for looking into the ark of the covenant? (1 Samuel 6: 19)”.

“Well I don’t blame you. I rather blame the culture of death in which you were certainly brought up. But I want to assure you that the present world—where freedom has become the absence of limit; where the individual is alone and there are no route maps; where there are no criteria by which different lifestyles could be evaluated; where any kind of discrimination between cultural norms as better or worse is forbidden; where there is no truth but only “what seems meaningful for me”; where there are no honoured models to shape behaviour; where religion (particularly the true one) is relegated to the margins of influence and where NOTHING IS SACRED—will definitely receive a greater punishment.

“Again, “Is it justifiable for 42 boys to be torn up by bears for mocking Elisha? (2 Kings 2: 23-24)”. I reply: Even something greater will happen to so many of today’s God-denying people who not only mock but utterly destroy all that is sacred!

“Finally, all your questions are certainly based on your arrogant assumption that man has no creator but is a master over himself. For, if you truly believe that someone actually created you (even without your consent), then it would logically follow that that person also has ABSOLUTE RIGHT over you — right to make laws for you to obey and even the right to terminate your very life anytime he wishes to do so.

“Now the funny thing is that you certainly would have no problem with the government of your country when, for instance, a law offender is legally executed (and I mean man-made laws). But you quickly question the creator of the world for destroying those who are going against His commandments, His laws!”

And sincere Michael Hardman, unlike demon-possessed Michael Stratton, said: “Jonathan, many thanks for taking the time to respond in such detail. Apologies if I came across as arrogant; that was certainly not my intention. I am just trying to understand, and there is much food for thought in what you have said.”

Let us beware of modern “Catholics” (especially followers of John Paul II and other V2 Popes!) and Protestants. Some of these people are simply worse than atheists. They don’t really believe in the Bible, rather they only pick and choose. They pick what they like and throw away what they don’t like. The reason behind this attitude? See: Francis and his gang of heretics pushing for women ordination.

Related: